HM Treasury responded to consultation on proposed amendments to retirement flexibility at the end of last year.
There are quite a number of amendments :
These new proposals are due to take effect from
- Unsecured Pension and Alternatively Secured Pension (ASP) will be replaced by a new system of ‘Capped Drawdown’.
- Maximum withdrawal will be based on 100% of GAD rather than 120% as current, and there will be a graduated move to the new levels for those already in drawdown.
- Reviews of income will be 3 yearly, or annually once aged 75.
- There will be a 55% tax charge on lump sum payments on death for funds in drawdown irrespective of age – rather than the 35% currently in place (albeit this level only applies pre age 75 at the moment).
- It will be possible to make a lump sum payment tax free to a charity – as is currently the case for those in ASP.
Rather more strikingly, ‘flexible drawdown’ will also be introduced:
- Where an individual can demonstrate that they have secured pensions of at least £20,000 p.a., known as the Minimum Income Requirement (MIR) from one or more sources, the cap on drawdown will be removed.
- This means an individual can draw as much pension as they wish from arrangements other than the MIR, until the fund is exhausted – subject, as normal, to income tax – although Protected Rights funds will be excluded from this.
- Only secure pension income (such as an annuity, occupational pension or state pension) will be considered in terms of the MIR.
- Individuals will not be able to accrue further tax relieved pension savings if in flexible drawdown.
As usual, advisers are presented with a number of matters to consider:
- Are there advantages to clients going into drawdown now so as to obtain the higher level of GAD available?
- Are all expressions of wish up to date – in particular, are there any clients who might wish to take advantage of the tax free charity payment on death?
- Some clients may suffer a drop in actual income (or an expectation of income) when the rates drop to 100% of GAD – do these clients require review and consultation?
- Some clients in drawdown may be considering a transfer to a new provider. Is it best to consider this sooner, rather than later, so as to retain the remainder of the 5 year period at the 120% GAD level?
No comments:
Post a Comment